In this week's episode, Anna sought advice on an ongoing car accident claim involving a tow truck company and her insurer, RAC, with Nick suggesting Consumer Protection and the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) as avenues for resolution. Lindsay raised concerns about a new development impacting his driveway, and Zeno questioned transfer fees for a new trailer, with Nick clarifying the buyer's responsibility and suggesting contacting the Department of Commerce. Finally, Greg discussed a parking fine issued by the Town of Cambridge due to an Easy Park registration error, highlighting the council's strict enforcement.

In this week's episode, Lindsay raised concerns about RAC's delay in repairing his car after an accident, with Nick recommending an AFCA complaint after an internal complaint failed. Chris inquired about a $15,000 fee to use a laneway for his property development, and Nick advised checking the City of Stirling's planning scheme for exemptions and potentially speaking to a town planner. Emmett sought a refund for a misrepresented product from a 4x4 fitment centre, and Nick suggested invoking Australian Consumer Law and threatening a minor case claim in Magistrates Court. Finally, Tracey discussed issues with her landlord, including backdated lease agreements and an invalid rent increase, with Nick confirming the impropriety of backdating and the requirement for rent increases to be in an approved form.

In this week's episode, callers discuss various legal issues. Nick clarified that smacking children in WA is lawful under specific conditions. Vicki queried about contesting her stepmother's will where Nick introduced the concept of promissory estoppel for potential claims. Troy's car purchase woes led Nick to advise on Australian Consumer Law for a refund. John's issue with an airline not refunding for a downgraded seat prompted Nick to suggest pursuing the claim in Magistrates Court. Diana raised concerns about retrieving a car in her son's name, to which Nick recommended police involvement or Magistrates Court. Finally, Rob asked about an estranged child challenging a will, and Nick stated that name changes do not affect the right to challenge.