In this week’s episode, Nick discussed a class action lawsuit against Sportsbet for allegedly circumventing laws against live betting. A caller named Mo sought advice on creating a will and appointing an executor, and Nick provided guidance on the process and costs involved. Another caller, Anthony, asked about his daughter's parking fine from a private operator. Nick offered insights into dealing with such fines and the difference between private enforcement and government-issued fines. Lastly, Mike inquired about his neighbor's surveillance camera that overlooked a common area, and Nick explained the relevant legislation and potential courses of action.

In this week’s episode, Carl faced a $3 million building defect issue due to a collapsed builder, and Nick emphasized reviewing insurance policies and contracts, recommending specialized legal advice. Rob detailed a car-purchase scam stemming from a dealership email hack; Nick explained that consumer privacy obligations could leave the dealership liable. Another caller, Paul, learned his uninsured daughter could sue the at-fault, unlicensed driver, though recovering damages might be futile if the driver has no assets. Finally, Jody discovered her employer’s attempt to dock holiday pay without consent likely breaches employment law, and Nick advised contacting the Fair Work Ombudsman for assistance.

In this week's episode, Nick discussed beach ownership, clarifying that Australian beaches are government property. Julie sought advice on returning a TV that didn't meet the salesperson's claims about its performance in bright rooms, and Nick advised her on her rights under Australian Consumer Law. Lastly, Nick explained the importance of preparing an advance health directive or enduring power of guardianship to ensure medical wishes are followed in the event of incapacitation.

In this week's episode, Nick discussed divorce day and the lengthy divorce process in Western Australia. Kevin, a caller, sought advice on enforcing a court order against his ex-partner who was violating their agreement, and Nick outlined the legal procedure for enforcement. Des, another caller, expressed his frustration over the lack of victim support, recounting his experience with his former wife's murder and the difficulty in obtaining information about the juvenile involved in a prior break-in. Nick offered condolences and explained the limitations due to privacy laws.

In this week’s episode, Nick Marouchak offered advice on consumer rights for faulty Christmas gifts, family law issues during the holidays, and end-of-year workplace disputes. A caller named Nick discussed contesting a speeding ticket due to a recent speed limit change. Marouchak suggested using a mistake of fact as a defense. He also recommended settling property disputes between ex-partners outside of court.

In this week’s episode, a key point of discussion revolves around the recent amendments to the superannuation regulations for contractors, where Nick elaborates on the specific scenarios that warrant super contributions. He also addresses Brian's predicament with a blinds company, shedding light on consumer rights and the legal recourse available when services don't meet the agreed-upon standards. The conversation shifts to the topic of superannuation access due to financial distress, and Nick imparts insights on some lesser-known traffic regulations.

In this week’s episode, Sean sought clarity on the legality of speed limit signs during inactive roadwork weekends, which may cause confusion and unintentional speeding. Nick clarified the legal necessity to adhere to the signs regardless of roadwork status. Peter queried about the legitimacy of his previous job being filled after his redundancy two years prior, and was informed by Nick that the window for legal recourse has closed. Dan raised concerns about his rights concerning a persistently defective washing machine, with Nick outlining the consumer's entitlement to opt for a refund or repair under Australian Consumer Law for a major fault. Finally, Rob brought up an uneasy situation regarding a letter from Ford about a potential defect in his car, and Nick recommended seeking assurance from a dealer.

In this week’s episode, a listener named Martin sought advice regarding his friend's entitlement to her husband's estate in the event of a divorce after one year of marriage. Nick from MKI Legal provided insight, noting that in such short marriages without children, the husband's claim to assets typically remains limited. He also touched upon the concept of spousal maintenance for financially dependent spouses. Another topic discussed was the rights of security guards to conduct bag searches outside supermarkets. Nick emphasized the need for consent in such searches and outlined the conditions under which a citizen's arrest might be appropriate. Lastly, Nick delved into consumer rights, advising that Australian Consumer Law offers guidance on remedies for defective products or goods unfit for their intended use.

In this week’s episode, Nick addressed pressing legal issues, including the incorporation of coercive control into domestic violence legislation. He elaborated on the new laws that recognise non-physical abuse forms, such as isolation and financial manipulation, to safeguard victims. The conversation also touched on the utilisation of electronic tracking for serious domestic violence offenders and the potential abuse of restraining orders in family law. Linda also called in sharing her daughter's plight with an ex-partner's coercive financial behavior. Nick offered advice on legal strategies, like suing for the debt or exploring undue influence, and the possibility of involving the family court, while also considering the emotional toll of legal action against an abusive former partner.

In this week’s episode, Shane called in with a dilemma about his desire to sell his half of an industrial property co-owned with a friend. Nick advised that Shane, as a 50% owner, has the right to petition the Supreme Court for an order to sell the property under the Property Law Act. He recommended Shane seek assistance from a property lawyer, specifically naming David McMullen. Gary had a question from someone he has spoken to called Kevin Townley, which referred to a boat collision and the challenges in acquiring CCTV footage due to privacy regulations. Nick provided a legal strategy for Kevin to obtain the footage by applying to the Supreme Court for discovery against the city or the police and warned about the potential for defamation if the footage is improperly shared.

In this week’s episode, a caller named Robin inquired about a tenancy in common issue involving a relationship breakdown and property rights. Nick explained that in a long-term de facto relationship, the division of assets might approach a 50/50 split, and highlighted the importance of recording any agreement in writing through consent orders or a binding financial agreement. Another caller, Mark, asked about the necessity and execution of a power of attorney for his mother, to which Nick advised that it is a useful document allowing financial decisions to be made should his mother lose mental capacity. He clarified that a power of attorney is separate from a will and does not supersede it.

In this week’s episode, discussions are made into the data privacy concerns regarding electric vehicles (EVs), specifically Chinese-made EVs, and how individuals in Australia can request their personal data from these companies under the Privacy Act. Craig inquired about updating his will regarding the disposition of a bequeathed asset, and Nick emphasised the importance of keeping wills current, providing the necessary process for that to be done. Kevin raises a question about possible legal action against the government regulatory body ASIC for alleged failure and negligence. Nick addresses this query by discussing the challenges involved in taking legal action against a regulatory body and offers alternative strategies. Lastly, Mark raised concerns over rising strata fees, leading Nick to discuss the post-COVID solvency of businesses and its impact on strata operations.

In this week’s episode, Jason asked about renting out a caravan on private property under new rules, and Nick promised to research advertising restrictions. Caroline discussed her mother's involvement in an Aldi gift card scam, pondering the store's liability, with Nick noting the need for further legal review. John shared his dissatisfaction with the Commonwealth Bank for closing his son's accounts without clear reasons, and Nick suggested pursuing a resolution through the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) and the possibility of compensation for emotional distress.

In this radio conversation, Gary Adshead discusses a surprising workers' compensation claim with Nicholas Marouchak from MKI Legal. A council worker won the claim after being injured at home during a coffee break by tripping over a fence installed to keep puppies away from a rabbit. The discussion highlights that workers' compensation covers employees at their place of employment, which can include a home if authorised by the employer. It covers injuries during authorised breaks and regardless of fault. Employers must ensure a safe workplace, which includes assessing home environments for risks. This case raises questions about employer responsibilities for home workplaces and the potential loopholes as more people work from home. Link to topic discussed: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-29/council-employee-wins-wfh-workers-compensation-claim/104529156

In this week's episode, Nick discussed the public's concern over the presence of registered sex offenders in Western Australia. With around 5,800 offenders on the registry and more than 3,000 actively monitored, this episode delved into the community protection register that allows locals to identify high-risk individuals nearby. Nick emphasised the severe legal consequences of distributing information like photos from the register, which could lead to a five-year imprisonment. Brian addressed a collision involving an Amazon delivery vehicle, guiding the driver through the intricacies of the insurance claim process. Additionally, Nick provided insights for Stuart whose family is in a legal battle over an inheritance issue, where a sister-in-law faced exclusion from a will. Nick explained the options available for contesting such decisions.